Download high-resolution image
Listen to a clip from the audiobook
audio pause button
0:00
0:00

The Butterfly Effect

Insects and the Making of the Modern World

Listen to a clip from the audiobook
audio pause button
0:00
0:00
Audiobook Download
On sale Aug 25, 2020 | 6 Hours and 47 Minutes | 9780593212165
Grades 9-12 + AP/IB

See Additional Formats
A fascinating, entertaining dive into the long-standing relationship between humans and insects, revealing the surprising ways we depend on these tiny, six-legged creatures.

Insects might make us shudder in disgust, but they are also responsible for many of the things we take for granted in our daily lives. When we bite into a shiny apple, listen to the resonant notes of a violin, get dressed, receive a dental implant, or get a manicure, we are the beneficiaries of a vast army of insects. Try as we might to replicate their raw material (silk, shellac, and cochineal, for instance), our artificial substitutes have proven subpar at best, and at worst toxic, ensuring our interdependence with the insect world for the foreseeable future.
     Drawing on research in laboratory science, agriculture, fashion, and international cuisine, Edward D. Melillo weaves a vibrant world history that illustrates the inextricable and fascinating bonds between humans and insects. Across time, we have not only coexisted with these creatures but have relied on them for, among other things, the key discoveries of modern medical science and the future of the world's food supply. Without insects, entire sectors of global industry would grind to a halt and essential features of modern life would disappear. Here is a beguiling appreciation of the ways in which these creatures have altered--and continue to shape--the very framework of our existence.

Cover image: Various Moths and Butterflies by Kubo Shunman. H. O. Havemeyer Collection, Bequest of Mrs. H. O. Havemeyer, 1929. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.
© Elyse Butler
EDWARD D. MELILLO is professor of history and environmental studies at Amherst College. He is the author of Strangers on Familiar Soil: Rediscovering the Chile-California Connection (2015), which won the Western History Association's 2016 Caughey Prize for the most distinguished book on the American West. He was awarded the Mellon New Directions Fellowship in 2017. He received his PhD and his MPhil from Yale University and his BA from Swarthmore College. He grew up in Falmouth, Massachusetts, and now lives in South Hadley, Massachusetts. View titles by Edward D. Melillo
1

The Bug in the System
 
In November 1944, Decca Records released a single featuring Ella Fitzgerald and the Ink Spots. “Into Each Life Some Rain Must Fall” skyrocketed to number one on the top of the Billboard charts in the United States and inaugurated a long-term collaboration between the “First Lady of Song” and the fabled record producer Milt Gabler. A century before this musical milestone, the Ottoman sultan Abdülmecid I (1839–61) founded the Hereke Imperial Carpet Manufacture to supply elaborate silk rugs for his Dolmabahçe Palace on the Bosphorus. These extravagant carpets, among the finest ever woven, featured between three and four thousand knots per square inch. Six decades earlier, on October 19, 1781, Brigadier General Charles O’Hara of His Britannic Majesty’s Coldstream Guards donned his distinctive scarlet officer’s coat, strode onto the battlefield at Yorktown, Virginia, and surrendered the sword of Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis to Major General Benjamin Lincoln of the American Continental Army.
 
A trio of more incongruous events, spanning three centuries, is difficult to imagine, yet these episodes share an astonishing feature. They depended on the tremendous productive capacity of domesticated insects. The brittle shellac of Ella Fitzgerald’s 78 rpm record, the gossamer threads woven into the sultan’s silk carpets, and the crimson cochineal used to dye the brigadier general’s jacket entered the circuits of global commerce as secretions from the bodies of tiny invertebrates. Women and men in rural corners of northeastern India, the Ottoman Empire, and southern Mexico painstakingly raised the lac bugs (Kerria lacca), silkworms (Bombyx mori), and cochineal insects (Dactylopius coccus) that secreted the raw materials for these products.
 
Unwittingly, we have inherited the legacy of human-insect partnerships that yielded Ella Fitzgerald’s shellac, Sultan Abdülmecid I’s silk, and Brigadier General O’Hara’s cochineal. Six-legged creatures have been our unshakable companions and surreptitious roommates for millennia. The average home accommodates a remarkable profusion of insects. In 2017, following a five-continent, five-year examination of residences—ranging from urban high-rises to village bungalows— California Academy of Sciences entomologist Michelle Trautwein and her colleagues concluded, “Our lives are completely mixed up with the bugs that share our homes. . . . Every home you’ve ever lived in, from a rural Peruvian farmhouse to a studio apartment in Paris, is teeming with tiny life.”
 
In a related investigation, a team of scientists donned headlamps and latex gloves to comb through fifty homes in Raleigh, North Carolina. Scouring kitchen corners, crawl spaces, basements, closets, and air-conditioning vents, they discovered more than ten thousand species of insects, along with myriad spiders, centipedes, millipedes, and other arthropods. This clandestine menagerie was blithely residing alongside its unsuspecting human hosts.
 
While these findings intrigued some readers and spooked others, they were unsurprising to entomologists and evolutionary biologists. For the entirety of our planetary existence, we have dwelled with insects. We dine together (and, at times, on each other), we travel in tandem, and we sometimes share beds. Such relentless interactions with insects are threaded throughout the human experience. During the spring of 1748, sixteen-year-old George Washington accompanied a team of experienced wilderness surveyors as they trekked through the verdant forests of the Shenandoah Valley. The fledgling apprentice and future United States president was dismayed to find that his bed often consisted of nothing more than “a little straw—matted together without sheets or anything else but only one threadbare blanket with double its weight of vermin, such as lice, fleas, etc.”
 
Although Washington’s account evoked millennia of infested bedding, some of his European forebears had not regarded cohabitation with lice and fleas as a nuisance. At times, the act of hosting six-legged creatures on one’s body epitomized holiness. The union of vermin and virtue was on vivid display following one of the most notorious assassinations of the Middle Ages. On December 29, 1170, four knights in the service of King Henry II of England murdered the archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, on the flagstone steps of the prelate’s cathedral altar. Becket’s body lay in the icy church all night. The next day, in preparation for the burial, attendants removed a profuse assortment of garments, including a mantle, a linen vestment, a lamb’s-wool coat, several cloaks, a Benedictine robe, and a shirt. The innermost layer was “a tight-fitting suit of coarse hair cloth, covered on the outside with linen, the first of its kind seen in England. The innumerable vermin [i.e., lice] which had infested the dead prelate were stimulated to such activity by the cold that his hair cloth garment”—an uncomfortable shirt worn close to the skin—“boiled over with them like water simmering in a cauldron [and] the onlookers burst into alternate fits of weeping and laughter between the sorrow of having lost such a head and the joy of finding such a saint.” Suitably, Becket was propelled into the afterlife on the wings of a swarm.
 
In the annals of Christian piety, Becket’s vigorous infestation was hardly uncommon. The Scottish philosopher David Hume recounted how the Catholic saint Robert Bellarmine (1542–1621) “patiently and humbly allowed the fleas and other odious vermin to prey upon him. We shall have heaven, said he, to reward us for our sufferings: But these poor creatures have nothing but the enjoyment of the present life.” Such examples offer a new twist on the dictum “Cleanliness is next to godliness.” For the righteous, the unwashed body provided a safe haven for a holy glut of six-legged creatures.
 
From the sacred to the profane, insects have channeled our desires. The erotic verses of Anglican cleric John Donne’s Elizabethan-era poem “The Flea” illuminate this role. A young man becomes entranced by a winged bug, which suckles on his flesh and then hops over to feed on the woman of his desires. The stanzas ripen with carnal imagery: “It sucked me first, and now sucks thee / And in this flea our two bloods mingled be.” The couple’s bodily fluids merge within the insect. The creature’s innards have become their “marriage bed . . . cloistered in these living walls of jet.” As the old adage reminds us, a meal sets the table for courtship.
 
Whether factual or fictional, such scenarios blur the boundaries between species. We are never without insects. This habitual intimacy helps to explain why bugs have so often served as models of determination, productivity, and resilience. During the seventh century b.c.e., Japan received its ancient name Akitsushima—a hybrid of akitsu (dragonfly) and shima (island)—from Emperor Jimmu Tennō, who likened the ancient Yamato Province to a dragonfly licking its tail. In Japanese, the dragonfly came to be known as kachimushi, the “victory insect,” because of its hunting prowess and bravery. Molded onto sword pommels, embroidered into cloaks, carved onto armored chest plates, and displayed prominently on helmets, kachimushi served as symbols of a samurai warrior’s fortitude in battle and his serenity in domestic life.
 
Insect behavior offered similar wellsprings of inspiration to the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. In Proverbs (6:6), the sage king Solomon advises, “Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise,” while the Qur’an (16:68–69) proclaims, “And your Lord revealed to the bee saying: Make hives in the mountains and in the trees and in what they build: Then eat of all the fruits and walk in the ways of your Lord submissively.”
 
In more recent times, ants and bees have served as exemplars of diligent labor. Manchester, England, a center of textile manufacturing during the Industrial Revolution, features the hardworking bee on its coat of arms, and the landing outside the city’s Great Hall is known as “the Bees.” Similarly, the Confederation of Mozambican Business Associations gives an entrepreneur-of-the-year award, “a statue of an ant, chosen because of this insect’s reputation as a tireless worker.” For the same reasons, the U.S. Navy’s Construction Battalion (“C.B.”)— also known as the “Seabees”—adopted the bee as a symbol of persistence and industriousness. The Seabees’ integral role in installing military infrastructure for Allied operations in the Pacific Theater earned them the motto “The difficult we do now; the impossible takes a little longer.”
 
The beehive has even provided a convenient model for economic theorists. The Dutch-born physician and political philosopher Bernard Mandeville (1670–1733) is remembered chiefly for his two-volume Fable of the Bees; or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Published first as a poem in 1705, and appearing as part of a more extensive book in 1714, Mandeville’s controversial proposal used the extended metaphor of the social beehive to argue that sinful behaviors, like pride and the pursuit of luxury, led to the general wealth and well-being of society.
 
Autocrats and demagogues have also relied on insect imagery. When choosing a family emblem for the House of Bourbon, Napoléon Bonaparte rejected the regal fleur-de-lis in favor of the resourceful honeybee. Likewise, the Prussian statesman Otto von Bismarck dreamed of a similarly insectlike precision to life: “If I had to choose the form I would rather live in again, I think it would be as an ant. Just see: this little creature lives under a perfect political organization. All ants are obliged to labour, to lead a useful life; all are industrious, and perfect subordination prevails, with discipline and order.”
 
The display of exactitude the Iron Chancellor witnessed in the ant colony extends downward from the social network to the level of individual anatomy. Insect bodies are a meticulous marriage of form and function. The word “insect” derives from the Latin term insectum, a literal translation of the Greek word ἔντομον (éntomon), meaning “cut into sections.” Indeed, all insects mature from a larval or nymph stage to an adult form with a three-part body composed of a head, a thorax, and an abdomen. This three-part structure is one of their most obvious features.
 
In addition, they have tough and semitransparent exoskeletons that provide their bodies with a rigid external scaffolding. Such a configuration has advantages for small creatures. Like a knight’s armor, it offers a protective casing against adversaries. Exoskeletons do not expand as the animal grows. In order to enlarge, an insect sheds its old carapace and develops a new one. At first, the replacement coating is malleable like wet papier-mâché, taking time to harden. Because the pull of gravity is minimal on a small body, this evolutionary strategy works. Expand an insect to the size of a human, however, and the body would soon be crushed by the sheer weight of its own shell. This rigid sheath functions because of its built-in flex points. All insects have three pairs of jointed legs, which, quite literally, define the larger arthropod phylum to which insects belong, a grouping that also includes spiders, mites, centipedes, millipedes, and crustaceans (such as crabs, lobsters, crayfish, and shrimp). This Greek term is a fusion of arthro, which means “joint,” and pod, meaning “foot” or “leg.”
 
A pair of twitching antennae are among the most recognizable features of an insect’s body. These protracted sensors give their six-legged owners unprecedented mobility. Monarch butterflies use their wispy probes to dramatic effect. Anticipating the Copernican Revolution by more than 150 million years, migratory monarchs developed a heliocentric existence. Responding to cues from the sun, they use the internal rhythms in their antennae as a solar compass to guide their autumnal exodus from the northern United States and southern Canada. This built-in navigation system allows them to travel as far as twenty-five hundred miles in an astounding journey southward to their overwintering grounds in central Mexico.
 
An insect’s movements are also guided by a set of compound eyes, which a team of Europe’s leading robotics engineers has referred to as “masterpieces of integrated optics and neural design.” These multifaceted orbs are made up of many tiny ommatidia, clusters of photoreceptors surrounded by support cells and pigment cells. They give insects a sensitivity to a range of wavelengths much shorter than those detectable by the human eye. At the low end of the electromagnetic spectrum, bees are able to distinguish ultraviolet light, which is invisible to humans.* Hemispheric compound eyes also give insects a nearly 360-degree view, a distinct advantage when pursuing prey or fleeing predators.
 
For many insects, such nimble hunting maneuvers and death-defying stunts are aerial. Most adults have two pairs of wings, which feature pliable membranous tissue and rigid veins for support. Insects are the only invertebrates that can fly. Insect wings carry their owners aloft, provide protection, attract mates, and serve as timely warnings to potential predators. Members of a family of butterflies known as Nymphalidae even use puffy veins on their top wings to assist with hearing. The extraordinary mobility and maneuverability of winged insects give them access to a vast assortment of habitats and food sources unavailable to most of Earth’s animals, including our own species. A few types of insects do not have wings. The wingless insects include such groups as springtails and silverfish. Certain spiders (insects’ arachnid cousins) can “balloon” by spinning a web that acts like a parachute. This allows them to surf the wind to avoid predators and shift locations.
 
As scientific enterprises go, distinguishing humans from other beings seems like a relatively straightforward undertaking. Yet things get more complicated as we investigate such categorical divisions. Some twenty-five hundred years ago, Plato attempted to answer the question “What is a human being?” He replied, “A featherless biped.” In jest, the notorious gadfly Diogenes the Cynic plucked a chicken and brought the clucking, naked specimen to Plato’s Academy in Athens, announcing, “This is Plato’s man!” Faced with such ridicule, Plato had no choice but to amend his definition to include the caveat “with broad flat nails.”
 
Plato’s students attempted to add a degree of precision to such fanciful descriptions. Aristotle’s prodigious Historia animalium, composed in the fourth century b.c.e., marked the Western world’s first known attempt to systematically categorize insects. The Greek philosopher’s observations about these animals were precise for their time but contained errors, such as his assertion that some insects could spontaneously breed from dew, wood, putrefying mud, or dung. Four hundred years later, Roman natural philosopher Pliny the Elder (23–79 c.e.) devoted the entire eleventh book of his thirty-seven-volume Historia naturalis to insects. Remarking on these abundant yet minute creatures, Pliny contended, “In no one of her works has Nature more fully displayed her exhaustless ingenuity.” Philemon Holland’s 1601 translation of Pliny’s text inaugurated the use of the term “insect” in the English language.
 
"Melillo is a witty and eloquent guide through the fraught terrain of human-insect interactions, able to write as lucidly about the white-eyed mutant fruitfly as the four movements of Serenade in A . . . [He] is at his most inspiring, however, when he exalts the scientists who have rejected the view that there’s little in the world of insects to remind us of our own."—Christopher Irmscher, The Wall Street Journal

"Fascinating . . . Stories of intrigue and the breaking of lucrative monopolies mix with natural history to forge an unusual history intertwining human and insect life and full of aha moments."—Nancy Bent, Booklist

“Intriguing and comprehensive. . . Melillo’s fascinating survey makes a persuasive argument that some of the world’s smallest animals are also ‘bottomless reservoirs of possibility.’”Publishers Weekly

"Melillo introduces many little-known facts and moments of insight, making this an engaging and often surprising read for those interested in environmental history."—Library Journal

"Taut, vibrant. . . [A] succinct, colorful contribution to entomological literature."Kirkus

"Hard to put down, The Butterfly Effect is a masterful revelation of our interwoven existence with the world of insects and far deeper than most would possibly imagine. Part humanist, historian and scientist, Edward Melillo writes with charm and depth. A must read for anyone with curiosity and interest in how the world works and how seriously our existence is intertwined."—Thomas E. Lovejoy, co-author of Biodiversity and Climate Change

"It's a buzzing, crawling, flapping planet. Edward Melillo, with great affection and respect, reminds us not to forget that we share the planet with an amazing menagerie of remarkable creatures, many of them six-legged. We would be wise to pay more attention!"—Bill McKibben, author Oil and Honey

"In this vividly written volume, Melillo trains a microscope on macrohistory both ancient and modern, showing how a handful of insect species helped to shape our world.  Industrious silkworms, edible crickets, lac bugs, and other useful six-legged critters share the historical stage with merchants, manufacturers, and scientists in a story as entertaining as it is instructive. "—J.R. McNeill, author of Mosquito Empires

"Insects turn up everywhere, including throughout human history. Lively and engrossing, Edward Melillo's The Butterfly Effect shows that bugs matter every bit as much as generals and emperors."—Elizabeth Kolbert, author of The Sixth Extinction 

“All of us, all the time, are surrounded by the inconceivable multitudes of the insect world. Yet somehow I was surprised to learn from The Butterfly Effect how deeply these tiny creatures are embedded in human history--and not just because some insects spread disease. In case after enthralling case, Ted Melillo shows how insects have made fortunes, fueled empires, and helped with the creation of great art, all the while making agriculture possible through pollination. Come for the weird orchid bugs that inspired Darwin, stay for the fascinating people who have unraveled the secrets of insect societies!” —Charles C. Mann, author of 1491

About

A fascinating, entertaining dive into the long-standing relationship between humans and insects, revealing the surprising ways we depend on these tiny, six-legged creatures.

Insects might make us shudder in disgust, but they are also responsible for many of the things we take for granted in our daily lives. When we bite into a shiny apple, listen to the resonant notes of a violin, get dressed, receive a dental implant, or get a manicure, we are the beneficiaries of a vast army of insects. Try as we might to replicate their raw material (silk, shellac, and cochineal, for instance), our artificial substitutes have proven subpar at best, and at worst toxic, ensuring our interdependence with the insect world for the foreseeable future.
     Drawing on research in laboratory science, agriculture, fashion, and international cuisine, Edward D. Melillo weaves a vibrant world history that illustrates the inextricable and fascinating bonds between humans and insects. Across time, we have not only coexisted with these creatures but have relied on them for, among other things, the key discoveries of modern medical science and the future of the world's food supply. Without insects, entire sectors of global industry would grind to a halt and essential features of modern life would disappear. Here is a beguiling appreciation of the ways in which these creatures have altered--and continue to shape--the very framework of our existence.

Cover image: Various Moths and Butterflies by Kubo Shunman. H. O. Havemeyer Collection, Bequest of Mrs. H. O. Havemeyer, 1929. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.

Author

© Elyse Butler
EDWARD D. MELILLO is professor of history and environmental studies at Amherst College. He is the author of Strangers on Familiar Soil: Rediscovering the Chile-California Connection (2015), which won the Western History Association's 2016 Caughey Prize for the most distinguished book on the American West. He was awarded the Mellon New Directions Fellowship in 2017. He received his PhD and his MPhil from Yale University and his BA from Swarthmore College. He grew up in Falmouth, Massachusetts, and now lives in South Hadley, Massachusetts. View titles by Edward D. Melillo

Excerpt

1

The Bug in the System
 
In November 1944, Decca Records released a single featuring Ella Fitzgerald and the Ink Spots. “Into Each Life Some Rain Must Fall” skyrocketed to number one on the top of the Billboard charts in the United States and inaugurated a long-term collaboration between the “First Lady of Song” and the fabled record producer Milt Gabler. A century before this musical milestone, the Ottoman sultan Abdülmecid I (1839–61) founded the Hereke Imperial Carpet Manufacture to supply elaborate silk rugs for his Dolmabahçe Palace on the Bosphorus. These extravagant carpets, among the finest ever woven, featured between three and four thousand knots per square inch. Six decades earlier, on October 19, 1781, Brigadier General Charles O’Hara of His Britannic Majesty’s Coldstream Guards donned his distinctive scarlet officer’s coat, strode onto the battlefield at Yorktown, Virginia, and surrendered the sword of Lieutenant General Charles Cornwallis to Major General Benjamin Lincoln of the American Continental Army.
 
A trio of more incongruous events, spanning three centuries, is difficult to imagine, yet these episodes share an astonishing feature. They depended on the tremendous productive capacity of domesticated insects. The brittle shellac of Ella Fitzgerald’s 78 rpm record, the gossamer threads woven into the sultan’s silk carpets, and the crimson cochineal used to dye the brigadier general’s jacket entered the circuits of global commerce as secretions from the bodies of tiny invertebrates. Women and men in rural corners of northeastern India, the Ottoman Empire, and southern Mexico painstakingly raised the lac bugs (Kerria lacca), silkworms (Bombyx mori), and cochineal insects (Dactylopius coccus) that secreted the raw materials for these products.
 
Unwittingly, we have inherited the legacy of human-insect partnerships that yielded Ella Fitzgerald’s shellac, Sultan Abdülmecid I’s silk, and Brigadier General O’Hara’s cochineal. Six-legged creatures have been our unshakable companions and surreptitious roommates for millennia. The average home accommodates a remarkable profusion of insects. In 2017, following a five-continent, five-year examination of residences—ranging from urban high-rises to village bungalows— California Academy of Sciences entomologist Michelle Trautwein and her colleagues concluded, “Our lives are completely mixed up with the bugs that share our homes. . . . Every home you’ve ever lived in, from a rural Peruvian farmhouse to a studio apartment in Paris, is teeming with tiny life.”
 
In a related investigation, a team of scientists donned headlamps and latex gloves to comb through fifty homes in Raleigh, North Carolina. Scouring kitchen corners, crawl spaces, basements, closets, and air-conditioning vents, they discovered more than ten thousand species of insects, along with myriad spiders, centipedes, millipedes, and other arthropods. This clandestine menagerie was blithely residing alongside its unsuspecting human hosts.
 
While these findings intrigued some readers and spooked others, they were unsurprising to entomologists and evolutionary biologists. For the entirety of our planetary existence, we have dwelled with insects. We dine together (and, at times, on each other), we travel in tandem, and we sometimes share beds. Such relentless interactions with insects are threaded throughout the human experience. During the spring of 1748, sixteen-year-old George Washington accompanied a team of experienced wilderness surveyors as they trekked through the verdant forests of the Shenandoah Valley. The fledgling apprentice and future United States president was dismayed to find that his bed often consisted of nothing more than “a little straw—matted together without sheets or anything else but only one threadbare blanket with double its weight of vermin, such as lice, fleas, etc.”
 
Although Washington’s account evoked millennia of infested bedding, some of his European forebears had not regarded cohabitation with lice and fleas as a nuisance. At times, the act of hosting six-legged creatures on one’s body epitomized holiness. The union of vermin and virtue was on vivid display following one of the most notorious assassinations of the Middle Ages. On December 29, 1170, four knights in the service of King Henry II of England murdered the archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, on the flagstone steps of the prelate’s cathedral altar. Becket’s body lay in the icy church all night. The next day, in preparation for the burial, attendants removed a profuse assortment of garments, including a mantle, a linen vestment, a lamb’s-wool coat, several cloaks, a Benedictine robe, and a shirt. The innermost layer was “a tight-fitting suit of coarse hair cloth, covered on the outside with linen, the first of its kind seen in England. The innumerable vermin [i.e., lice] which had infested the dead prelate were stimulated to such activity by the cold that his hair cloth garment”—an uncomfortable shirt worn close to the skin—“boiled over with them like water simmering in a cauldron [and] the onlookers burst into alternate fits of weeping and laughter between the sorrow of having lost such a head and the joy of finding such a saint.” Suitably, Becket was propelled into the afterlife on the wings of a swarm.
 
In the annals of Christian piety, Becket’s vigorous infestation was hardly uncommon. The Scottish philosopher David Hume recounted how the Catholic saint Robert Bellarmine (1542–1621) “patiently and humbly allowed the fleas and other odious vermin to prey upon him. We shall have heaven, said he, to reward us for our sufferings: But these poor creatures have nothing but the enjoyment of the present life.” Such examples offer a new twist on the dictum “Cleanliness is next to godliness.” For the righteous, the unwashed body provided a safe haven for a holy glut of six-legged creatures.
 
From the sacred to the profane, insects have channeled our desires. The erotic verses of Anglican cleric John Donne’s Elizabethan-era poem “The Flea” illuminate this role. A young man becomes entranced by a winged bug, which suckles on his flesh and then hops over to feed on the woman of his desires. The stanzas ripen with carnal imagery: “It sucked me first, and now sucks thee / And in this flea our two bloods mingled be.” The couple’s bodily fluids merge within the insect. The creature’s innards have become their “marriage bed . . . cloistered in these living walls of jet.” As the old adage reminds us, a meal sets the table for courtship.
 
Whether factual or fictional, such scenarios blur the boundaries between species. We are never without insects. This habitual intimacy helps to explain why bugs have so often served as models of determination, productivity, and resilience. During the seventh century b.c.e., Japan received its ancient name Akitsushima—a hybrid of akitsu (dragonfly) and shima (island)—from Emperor Jimmu Tennō, who likened the ancient Yamato Province to a dragonfly licking its tail. In Japanese, the dragonfly came to be known as kachimushi, the “victory insect,” because of its hunting prowess and bravery. Molded onto sword pommels, embroidered into cloaks, carved onto armored chest plates, and displayed prominently on helmets, kachimushi served as symbols of a samurai warrior’s fortitude in battle and his serenity in domestic life.
 
Insect behavior offered similar wellsprings of inspiration to the Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. In Proverbs (6:6), the sage king Solomon advises, “Go to the ant, thou sluggard; consider her ways, and be wise,” while the Qur’an (16:68–69) proclaims, “And your Lord revealed to the bee saying: Make hives in the mountains and in the trees and in what they build: Then eat of all the fruits and walk in the ways of your Lord submissively.”
 
In more recent times, ants and bees have served as exemplars of diligent labor. Manchester, England, a center of textile manufacturing during the Industrial Revolution, features the hardworking bee on its coat of arms, and the landing outside the city’s Great Hall is known as “the Bees.” Similarly, the Confederation of Mozambican Business Associations gives an entrepreneur-of-the-year award, “a statue of an ant, chosen because of this insect’s reputation as a tireless worker.” For the same reasons, the U.S. Navy’s Construction Battalion (“C.B.”)— also known as the “Seabees”—adopted the bee as a symbol of persistence and industriousness. The Seabees’ integral role in installing military infrastructure for Allied operations in the Pacific Theater earned them the motto “The difficult we do now; the impossible takes a little longer.”
 
The beehive has even provided a convenient model for economic theorists. The Dutch-born physician and political philosopher Bernard Mandeville (1670–1733) is remembered chiefly for his two-volume Fable of the Bees; or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Published first as a poem in 1705, and appearing as part of a more extensive book in 1714, Mandeville’s controversial proposal used the extended metaphor of the social beehive to argue that sinful behaviors, like pride and the pursuit of luxury, led to the general wealth and well-being of society.
 
Autocrats and demagogues have also relied on insect imagery. When choosing a family emblem for the House of Bourbon, Napoléon Bonaparte rejected the regal fleur-de-lis in favor of the resourceful honeybee. Likewise, the Prussian statesman Otto von Bismarck dreamed of a similarly insectlike precision to life: “If I had to choose the form I would rather live in again, I think it would be as an ant. Just see: this little creature lives under a perfect political organization. All ants are obliged to labour, to lead a useful life; all are industrious, and perfect subordination prevails, with discipline and order.”
 
The display of exactitude the Iron Chancellor witnessed in the ant colony extends downward from the social network to the level of individual anatomy. Insect bodies are a meticulous marriage of form and function. The word “insect” derives from the Latin term insectum, a literal translation of the Greek word ἔντομον (éntomon), meaning “cut into sections.” Indeed, all insects mature from a larval or nymph stage to an adult form with a three-part body composed of a head, a thorax, and an abdomen. This three-part structure is one of their most obvious features.
 
In addition, they have tough and semitransparent exoskeletons that provide their bodies with a rigid external scaffolding. Such a configuration has advantages for small creatures. Like a knight’s armor, it offers a protective casing against adversaries. Exoskeletons do not expand as the animal grows. In order to enlarge, an insect sheds its old carapace and develops a new one. At first, the replacement coating is malleable like wet papier-mâché, taking time to harden. Because the pull of gravity is minimal on a small body, this evolutionary strategy works. Expand an insect to the size of a human, however, and the body would soon be crushed by the sheer weight of its own shell. This rigid sheath functions because of its built-in flex points. All insects have three pairs of jointed legs, which, quite literally, define the larger arthropod phylum to which insects belong, a grouping that also includes spiders, mites, centipedes, millipedes, and crustaceans (such as crabs, lobsters, crayfish, and shrimp). This Greek term is a fusion of arthro, which means “joint,” and pod, meaning “foot” or “leg.”
 
A pair of twitching antennae are among the most recognizable features of an insect’s body. These protracted sensors give their six-legged owners unprecedented mobility. Monarch butterflies use their wispy probes to dramatic effect. Anticipating the Copernican Revolution by more than 150 million years, migratory monarchs developed a heliocentric existence. Responding to cues from the sun, they use the internal rhythms in their antennae as a solar compass to guide their autumnal exodus from the northern United States and southern Canada. This built-in navigation system allows them to travel as far as twenty-five hundred miles in an astounding journey southward to their overwintering grounds in central Mexico.
 
An insect’s movements are also guided by a set of compound eyes, which a team of Europe’s leading robotics engineers has referred to as “masterpieces of integrated optics and neural design.” These multifaceted orbs are made up of many tiny ommatidia, clusters of photoreceptors surrounded by support cells and pigment cells. They give insects a sensitivity to a range of wavelengths much shorter than those detectable by the human eye. At the low end of the electromagnetic spectrum, bees are able to distinguish ultraviolet light, which is invisible to humans.* Hemispheric compound eyes also give insects a nearly 360-degree view, a distinct advantage when pursuing prey or fleeing predators.
 
For many insects, such nimble hunting maneuvers and death-defying stunts are aerial. Most adults have two pairs of wings, which feature pliable membranous tissue and rigid veins for support. Insects are the only invertebrates that can fly. Insect wings carry their owners aloft, provide protection, attract mates, and serve as timely warnings to potential predators. Members of a family of butterflies known as Nymphalidae even use puffy veins on their top wings to assist with hearing. The extraordinary mobility and maneuverability of winged insects give them access to a vast assortment of habitats and food sources unavailable to most of Earth’s animals, including our own species. A few types of insects do not have wings. The wingless insects include such groups as springtails and silverfish. Certain spiders (insects’ arachnid cousins) can “balloon” by spinning a web that acts like a parachute. This allows them to surf the wind to avoid predators and shift locations.
 
As scientific enterprises go, distinguishing humans from other beings seems like a relatively straightforward undertaking. Yet things get more complicated as we investigate such categorical divisions. Some twenty-five hundred years ago, Plato attempted to answer the question “What is a human being?” He replied, “A featherless biped.” In jest, the notorious gadfly Diogenes the Cynic plucked a chicken and brought the clucking, naked specimen to Plato’s Academy in Athens, announcing, “This is Plato’s man!” Faced with such ridicule, Plato had no choice but to amend his definition to include the caveat “with broad flat nails.”
 
Plato’s students attempted to add a degree of precision to such fanciful descriptions. Aristotle’s prodigious Historia animalium, composed in the fourth century b.c.e., marked the Western world’s first known attempt to systematically categorize insects. The Greek philosopher’s observations about these animals were precise for their time but contained errors, such as his assertion that some insects could spontaneously breed from dew, wood, putrefying mud, or dung. Four hundred years later, Roman natural philosopher Pliny the Elder (23–79 c.e.) devoted the entire eleventh book of his thirty-seven-volume Historia naturalis to insects. Remarking on these abundant yet minute creatures, Pliny contended, “In no one of her works has Nature more fully displayed her exhaustless ingenuity.” Philemon Holland’s 1601 translation of Pliny’s text inaugurated the use of the term “insect” in the English language.
 

Praise

"Melillo is a witty and eloquent guide through the fraught terrain of human-insect interactions, able to write as lucidly about the white-eyed mutant fruitfly as the four movements of Serenade in A . . . [He] is at his most inspiring, however, when he exalts the scientists who have rejected the view that there’s little in the world of insects to remind us of our own."—Christopher Irmscher, The Wall Street Journal

"Fascinating . . . Stories of intrigue and the breaking of lucrative monopolies mix with natural history to forge an unusual history intertwining human and insect life and full of aha moments."—Nancy Bent, Booklist

“Intriguing and comprehensive. . . Melillo’s fascinating survey makes a persuasive argument that some of the world’s smallest animals are also ‘bottomless reservoirs of possibility.’”Publishers Weekly

"Melillo introduces many little-known facts and moments of insight, making this an engaging and often surprising read for those interested in environmental history."—Library Journal

"Taut, vibrant. . . [A] succinct, colorful contribution to entomological literature."Kirkus

"Hard to put down, The Butterfly Effect is a masterful revelation of our interwoven existence with the world of insects and far deeper than most would possibly imagine. Part humanist, historian and scientist, Edward Melillo writes with charm and depth. A must read for anyone with curiosity and interest in how the world works and how seriously our existence is intertwined."—Thomas E. Lovejoy, co-author of Biodiversity and Climate Change

"It's a buzzing, crawling, flapping planet. Edward Melillo, with great affection and respect, reminds us not to forget that we share the planet with an amazing menagerie of remarkable creatures, many of them six-legged. We would be wise to pay more attention!"—Bill McKibben, author Oil and Honey

"In this vividly written volume, Melillo trains a microscope on macrohistory both ancient and modern, showing how a handful of insect species helped to shape our world.  Industrious silkworms, edible crickets, lac bugs, and other useful six-legged critters share the historical stage with merchants, manufacturers, and scientists in a story as entertaining as it is instructive. "—J.R. McNeill, author of Mosquito Empires

"Insects turn up everywhere, including throughout human history. Lively and engrossing, Edward Melillo's The Butterfly Effect shows that bugs matter every bit as much as generals and emperors."—Elizabeth Kolbert, author of The Sixth Extinction 

“All of us, all the time, are surrounded by the inconceivable multitudes of the insect world. Yet somehow I was surprised to learn from The Butterfly Effect how deeply these tiny creatures are embedded in human history--and not just because some insects spread disease. In case after enthralling case, Ted Melillo shows how insects have made fortunes, fueled empires, and helped with the creation of great art, all the while making agriculture possible through pollination. Come for the weird orchid bugs that inspired Darwin, stay for the fascinating people who have unraveled the secrets of insect societies!” —Charles C. Mann, author of 1491

Books for Black History Month

In honor of Black History Month this February and beyond, we are highlighting essential fiction and nonfiction for students, teachers, and parents to share and discuss. Join Penguin Random House Education in celebrating the contributions of Black authors and illustrators by exploring the titles here: Black History – Middle School Black History – High School

Read more

2024 Middle and High School Collections

The Penguin Random House Education Middle School and High School Digital Collections feature outstanding fiction and nonfiction from the children’s, adult, DK, and Grupo Editorial divisions, as well as publishers distributed by Penguin Random House. Peruse online or download these valuable resources to discover great books in specific topic areas such as: English Language Arts,

Read more

PRH Education High School Collections

All reading communities should contain protected time for the sake of reading. Independent reading practices emphasize the process of making meaning through reading, not an end product. The school culture (teachers, administration, etc.) should affirm this daily practice time as inherently important instructional time for all readers. (NCTE, 2019)   The Penguin Random House High

Read more

PRH Education Translanguaging Collections

Translanguaging is a communicative practice of bilinguals and multilinguals, that is, it is a practice whereby bilinguals and multilinguals use their entire linguistic repertoire to communicate and make meaning (García, 2009; García, Ibarra Johnson, & Seltzer, 2017)   It is through that lens that we have partnered with teacher educators and bilingual education experts, Drs.

Read more